Home Help Contact  
A+ Essays

Search for:

Acceptance Essays
American History
Art and Paintings
Biographies
Book Reports
Business Reports
Cinema and Television
Computers and Internet
Current Events
Economics Essays
Education Essays
Engineering Reports
English Essays
Government Essays
Health Care
History Essays
Legal Issues
Marketing Essays
Medicine Essays
Music Essays
Mythology Essays
Philosophy Essays
Poetry Essays
Politics Essays
Psychology Essays
Religion Essays
Science Essays
Shakespeare Essays
Social Issues
Sociology Issues
Speech and Communications
Sports and Games
Technology Essays
Theater Essays



Free Essays > Economics Essays > Case Study: Amoco Oil Co. V. Borden, Inc

Case Study: Amoco Oil Co. V. Borden, Inc

Below is free essays on Case Study: Amoco Oil Co. V. Borden, Inc by A+ Essays, your one-stop source for free essays, free college term papers, and free term papers. Look for more free essays and free term papers using the search box above.

Word Count: 256
Page Count: 2

Case Study: Amoco Oil Co. V. Borden, Inc

Case Study: Amoco Oil Co. V. Borden, Inc

Amoco Oil Co. v. Borden, Inc.
889 F.2d 664 (5th Cir. 1989)
Plantiff and Defendants:
The Plantiff is Amoco Oil Company. The defendant is Borden, Inc.
Facts:
Amoco bought 114 acres of land from Borden, Inc. in Texas City, Texas. Borden was the owner of a phosphate fertilizer plant in that same location. After the land was purchased by Amoco, they found out that 35 acres of land was covered by a pile of mildly radioactive phosphogypsum, a by product of fertilizer manufacture. Amoco, unaware of the problem then hired guards and put up fences around the radioactive material. Amoco then sued Borden, under the superfund (CERCLA) for its responsive costs.
Lower Courts:
The district courts looked at Bordens' proposal that the amount of radiation emitted by the pile was less than some natural sources. The district court then ruled that Borden was not liable for the containment costs.
Issues Appealed:
Should Amoco have to pay the costs of containment or should Borden?
Who Wins:
Amoco Oil Co. wins in Supreme Court.
Reasoning:
1) The supreme court pointed out that the plantiff's who has incurred responce costs meets the liability requirements as a matter of law.
2) The Supreme Court also pointed out the fact that Amoco's security measures and site investigation are acceptable responce costs within the meaning of (CERCLA).
3) The Supreme Court concluded that Borden was accountable for the costs that the radioactive material produced.
4) Amoco was entitled to a summary judgement on the liability issue.
5) The District Court's ruling was reversed and remanded.

Economics Essays

© 2005 A+ Essays. All Rights Reserved. A+ Essays is your one-stop source for free essays, free college term papers, and free term papers. Part of the Free Essay Network.

Related Keywords: Amoco, Borden, costs, Court, Oil, land, Supreme, Co, radioactive, acres, Texas, pointed, pile, responce, liability, free essays, free term papers, free college term papers

Back to Top






Copyright 2000-2005 A+ Essays. All Rights Reserved.